Faith in the invisible hand of the market is killing us

Most people in the US believe that our national debt is a result of government waste and that the only way to get a handle on the debt is to cut spending on social services. According to this article, the only problem with that story is it isn’t true. The real problem according to this article is that our entire economic structure has morphed into speculative transactions that are now over seven times our actual GDP. Financial elites have invented a make believe world where they gamble, and whether they win or lose, we pay. Add the cost of wars (from which many of them also profit) and tax cuts for the wealthy and you have a recipe for disaster. Meanwhile we are cutting spending on the very things that might give us hope- like education. As long as most people believe that an invisible hand is steering the market, they will not suspect that the cards are marked and the game is rigged.

http://truth-out.org/news/item/12044-blind-faith-as-profit-engine-how-free-market-worshipers-use-christian-utopianism-to-bilk-the-middle-class

Looking for News on Women?

Women constitute half of our species, but most history books and newspapers cover human events as if violent European men were the stars of the story. Inter Press Service is a nice base to touch regularly. IPS is not as sensational as most news we might read, but it helps us remember that humans come in all colors, that other nations have a story to tell, that nurture is as newsworthy as violence, and that women are as central to the story as are men.

http://www.ipsnews.net/

NY Times as great paper, and as great propaganda arm

None of us likes to think too much when we are reading the paper in the morning. Most of us just want to scan a trusted source of information  like the NY Times before we begin our day. Unfortunately, whenever we read the news unconsciously, we are also taking in somebody else’s view of the world. In this country that means usually means we are absorbing the worldviews of the rich elite.

Edward S. Herman has written an essay for Z-Net magazine on the New York Times that may raise some interesting conversations. Herman praises the NY Times for its wide scope and wonderfully entertaining style. He then argues that the paper can also be understood as our nation’s most important arm of propaganda.

 

“>In fact, a case can be made that the NYT is the world’s greatest—or at least most important—organ of state propaganda. Because of its great prestige, its being pegged as a “liberal” newspaper, and the paper’s allowing just enough dissent to give the appearance of balance and to make its most serious apologetics seem credible, the general public is not aware of how often and how effectively the paper serves the imperial state, normalizing U.S. imperial ventures and putting them in a favorable light—and providing systematic apologetics for abuses by it favored clients. The editors even belatedly admitted their war-supportive bias in the run-up to the UN Charter-violating and lie-based Iraq war. They are clearly doing the same in the case of Iran, where the paper has had almost daily accounts of Iran’s alleged moves toward nuclear weapons capability, while working on the premise that Israel’s (and the U.S.’s) actual nuclear weapons, and almost daily and credible threats, are perfectly acceptable and understandable and don’t even constitute essential context in discussing the Iran menace.

On June 18, 1988 the paper did a confessional piece called “The Lie that Wasn’t Shot Down.” In 1983 the paper had done an editorial call to arms over reports that the Soviets had knowingly shot down a civilian Korean airliner. When part of the story turned out to be US propaganda to make it look like the Soviets were actually the “Evil Empire” of the American narrative, the newspaper was left holding the bag.

 “On Aug. 31, 1983, the Soviet Union shot down a Boeing 747 with the loss of 269 lives, having failed to identify it as a civilian airliner. Moscow deserved the universal obloquy it incurred. But the Reagan Administration added a savage twist, sometimes implying and sometimes saying outright that the Soviet Union knew it was attacking a civilian plane. Now, in an intelligence analysis released last week by Representative Lee Hamilton, the Administration in effect acknowledges, grudgingly, that it misled the American people and the world. Though diplomacy may at times require stretching the truth, the Administration had no need to paint the Soviet action blacker than it already was.

In his 1986 book, ”The Target Is Destroyed,” Seymour Hersh reported that American intelligence agencies, with their remarkable ability to intercept Soviet military communications, concluded within a few hours of the shoot-down that the Russian pilots were genuinely confused. They believed that Korean Air Lines Flight 007 was an American RC-135 reconnaissance plane, one of which had been in the area that night.

 

Herman goes on to cite other, more recent examples of such questionable coverage from Pinochet to Pussy Riot. Hugo Chavez has long been a target of the Times and of US propaganda. When the US moved to covertly undermine the democratically elected leader of Venezuela and replace him with a corporate puppet, the times covered the story as follows:

“Venezuelan democracy is no longer threatened by a would-be dictator. Mr. Chavez, a ruinous demagogue, [who] stepped down after the military intervened and handed power to a respected business leader, Pedro Carmona” (ed., “Hugo Chavez Departs,” April 13, 2002).

The paper went on to apologize for that incident as well, but that’s how propaganda usually works. If I hysterically shout “fire” several times in the same theater and then calmly explains each time that I was a mistaken, people will eventually come to feel unsafe in that theater.

 


http://www.zcommunications.org/great-paper-great-propaganda-organ-by-edward-s-herman

In the 2012 Presidential Race: Is it still Yankee vs Confederate?

According to the maps linked below, the modern Republican states consist of the former slave holding states, and the modern Democratic states come from what was the North side of the Civil War.

So were the slaveholders racists, or just good capitalists who valued profit over any other human value? The author claims that the Southern system was driven primarily by economics, not race. (Which is not to say they weren’t racist as well) Even after slavery was prohibited, the Southern mind still believed in low-wages for the poor, low-taxes for the rich, and, of course, few regulations upon business.

Here a couple of provocative quotes from the article linked below:

“…Anything that increases the bargaining power of Southern workers vs. Southern employers must be opposed, in the interest of the South’s regional economic development model.  Unions, federal wage and workplace regulations, and a generous, national welfare state all increase the bargaining power of Southern workers, by reducing their economic desperation.  Anti-union right-to-work laws, state control of wages and workplace regulations, and an inadequate welfare state all make Southern workers more helpless, pliant and dependent on the mercy of their employers.  A weak welfare state also maximizes the dependence of ordinary Southerners on the tax-favored clerical allies of the local Southern ruling class, the Protestant megachurches, whose own lucrative business model is to perform welfare functions that are performed by public agencies elsewhere, like child care.” Michael Lind Salon.com

“…Today many business-class conservatives from Texas and other Southern states such as former Texas Senator Phil Gramm champion “guest-worker programs” which would bring in Mexican nationals and others to work as indentured servants in the South, while forbidding them to become U.S. citizens with legal and voting rights.” -ibid.

http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/forget-red-vs-blue-its-slave-states-vs-free-states-2012

Radioactive rod lost by Halliburton found alongside Texas highway

Halliburton surveyors working on fracking in West Texas lost a radioactive rod of americium-241/beryllium alongside a highway, which was fortunately spotted some time later by an oil field worker.

“Individuals who swallow or inhale contaminated particulate matter experience a heightened risk for some types of cancer. Though the substances are relatively common in more advanced technology, including smoke detectors, the quantity misplaced by Halliburton workers was cause for serious concern.”

Halliburton has changed its name to avoid the trail of scandals, and has moved its headquarters to another country, but profiteering off disasters, cutting corners and passing the buck to the private sector is still their way of doing business.

When the BP oil spill happened, few of us were surprised to discover that Halliburton cement seals were a cause. The seals had failed several tests but Halliburton kept that information secret and then destroyed some of the evidence.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/10/08/halliburtons-missing-nuclear-waste-found-alongside-texas-highway/

 

First in her Harvard class, Ginsburg was turned down by 14 law firms

The following video celebrates Ruth Bader Ginsburg as a pioneer of women’s rights. Ginsburg was the first woman to sit on the Supreme Court. In this clip, she discusses some of the obstacles that faced her along the way.

http://www.makers.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000046

Why does the US fear Hugo Chavez so?

In the secret history of the United States, we have waged an unrelenting war against socialism in our own hemisphere not because we fear communism, but because we crave cheap markets. The little island of Cuba has lived under suffocating blockades ever since it chased the predatory capitalists off the island. We can truthfully say that Castro has been a dictator, but we will never know how he would have ruled if we had not attempted continual assassinations and overthrows of their government from the very start.

FAIR is a group that studies media bias. What follows is a look at how the US corporate media vilifies Hugo Chavez. For example, CNN’s David Frum compared Chavez to the evil Joker in Batman movies. According to the images presented by our corporate press, Chavez is a dictator. We do not seem to count the fact that he has been elected several times, which makes the word “dictator” in accurate to say the least. What is also left out of the official picture is the fact that our own nation has sought to secretly and illegally depose Chavez.

The US press often reports that Chavez has devastated Venezuela’s economy. But this report by FAIR reveals that Chavez, by nationalizing the oil nation’s oil production, has increased the purchasing power of the average Venezuelan two and a half times. What has been devastated is the grip of US corporations over the lives of Venezuelans. The US press does not seem to care when dictators who are friendly to the US let their people starve, so long as their markets are open to our corporations. But when Chavez channels the nation’s resources to the poorest of the poor, our press accuses him of “massive government vote buying.” The CNN article cites such sinister plots as a program,”that aims to build 200,000 housing units for Venezuela’s poor.”

I wish we had a “villain” like that in the United States.

 

http://www.fair.org/blog/#post-22408

Arkansas Candidate Argues for Execution of Disobedient Children

As a nation, we have made a big deal out of attacking the Taliban, but the Taliban are just the “rednecks” of Islam. Anyone raised in the South as I am, knows we have religious groups in the States that could give the Taliban a run for their money. It is only the separation of church and state that keeps our own Bubba’s from drawing blood.

Case in point is, Charlie Fuqua, Republican candidate in Arkansas. He has written a book that calls for the legal execution of disobedient children. The Book is called God’s Law- The Only Political Solution: A Prophecy of the Downfall of the United States or a Blueprint for National Prosperity.

You’ve heard the argument before, the Bible is God’s handbook for humankind. Not, of course, the Bible as understood by a liberal or someone with humanist leanings. But the Bible as understood by the person who wants the power. According to this line of thought, God has a divinely ordained pecking order. Problems in the world come when this order is not honored. So when wives disobey their husbands, when slaves disobey their masters, when subjects disobey their King, then chaos follows.

It isn’t Christianity’s fault, nor Republicans’ fault that they have whacko’s in their midst, but it is very much all of our fault when we do not loudly condemn those who attack others in our name. I realized in seminary that the church’s history should be written in blood not ink. No one can count the women burned as witches, the adulterers stoned, or the heretics murdered when we were in control.

So before our nation launches our crusade against the religious extremists elsewhere, we would be wise to do something to protect citizens from the Christian Taliban in our own midst.

 

http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/sarahmoricebrubaker/6490/let%E2%80%99s_make_it_legal_to_execute_disobedient_children%21/

Anti-Gay Group’s Attorney Fired After Searching for Men on Facebook

The American Center for Law & Justice was created by Pat Robertson as a counterbalance to the ACLU. Whereas the ACLU seeks to protect the “wall of separation” between church and state, the ACLJ seeks to give Christians special rights to decide how others should live. So if a Christian business wants to discriminate in hiring or policy, they can call ACLJ. If a conservative Catholic group wants to make sure women can’t get reproductive health care, they can call the ACLJ. If people from a small town want to make sure a gay or lesbian family does get the same rights as a heterosexual family, they can call the ACLJ.

One problem the Christian right has always had in its crusade against the “menace” of gay marriage, is that only closeted gay men can truly feel that threat. If a gay couple moves in at the end of my block, as a heterosexual male, I won’t give it a second thought. But a closeted gay man may lie awake at night imagining the “terrible” things what they might be doing. The Christian right can get all kinds of people upset about the issue of gay marriage, but only a closeted gay male will truly feel gay marriage as a threat to his own.

So it isn’t surprising when two men working together to rescue gay men from the “sin” of homosexuality, fall in love with each other, as happened with Exodus International. Or when the attorney for the ACLJ was fired for using Facebook to look for men.  A person’s gender orientation is part of who they are. We cannot lie about who we most fundamentally are and be faithful in any other way.

http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/petermontgomery/6495/anti-gay_group%27s_attorney_fired_after_searching_for_men_on_facebook/

Pew Poll: Number of Protestant Americans in Steep Decline

“For the first time since researchers began tracking the religious identity of Americans, fewer than half said they were Protestants, a steep decline from 40 years ago when Protestant churches claimed the loyalty of more than two-thirds of the population.”   -NY Times

It is a tendency in our nation in times of controversy to divide into two camps. So there may be a tendency among those who read this article to see it as purely good news, or purely bad. My hope is that we will ask a more complicated question than which side we are on. My hope is we will look more specifically at what we are gaining and what we are losing.

The new study by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public life made the following discoveries:

-It is not just mainline Protestant groups like Methodists or Presbyterians who are in decline, but also conservative ones.

-While the over all numbers have fallen, the losses are primarily among white Protestant churches.

-Nearly one in five Americans now describe themselves as atheist, agnostic or “nothing in particular.

-Catholics have remained stable, “mostly because an influx of immigrants has replaced the many Catholics who were raised in the church and left in the last five years,” one of the researchers said.      

 

As I say, instead of dividing into camps of believers or nonbelievers on this issue, or Protestant or not, I hope we can ask instead what we are gaining and what we are losing in this trend.  It is a good thing to lose superstition, but a bad thing to lose our reverence toward life. It is a good thing to lose rigid sectarian identity, but a bad thing to lose community. This poll reports that two thirds of those saying they have no religion still believe in God and one fifth say they pray every day. In other words, it is possible that we aren’t losing superstition so much as we are losing community.

Thanks to Karalei Nunn and others for passing on link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/us/study-finds-that-the-number-of-protestant-americans-is-declining.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20121010&_r=0