Bob Marley: “Me say war!”

Until the philosophy which hold one race superior and another inferior is finally and permanently discredited and abandoned -Everywhere is war -me say war!

That until there no longer first class and second class citizens of any nation, until the color of a (one’s) skin is of no more significance than the color of (one’s) eyes – me say war!

That until the basic human rights are equally guaranteed to all, without regard to race – dis a war.

That until that day the dream of lasting peace, world citizenship, rule of international morality will remain in but a fleeting illusion to be pursued, but never attained -now everywhere is war – war.

And until the ignoble and unhappy regimes that hold our brothers (and sisters) in Angola,
in Mozambique, South Africa in sub-human bondage have been toppled, utterly destroyed – well, everywhere is war -me say war!

War in the east, war in the west, war up north, war down south -war – war – rumours of war.

And until that day, the African continent will not know peace, we Africans will fight – we find it necessary -and we know we shall win as we are confident in the victory of good over evil -good over evil, yeah! Good over evil (fade out)
― Bob Marley

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL9DXaXufh8

 

Murder by leash

Those with limited power must normally use weapons to kill. Those with unassailable power can kill by simply making a rule.

 

If a pet owner tethers a dog to a tree and then neglects to feed it, he or she is rightly accused of killing the dog should it perish. In the same way those who unfairly distribute the goods of the world, and then allow human beings to perish through political neglect are guilty of those deaths. The weak have visible weapons. The strong can hide their violence behind laws, treaties, prisons, customs and anything that codifies discrepancies of wealth and power.

Just as a person is guilty when using overt weapons of violence, so are those guilty who use covert weapons like laws that do not allow others to meet their basic needs. Such powerful people are guilty of murder by leash.

Adam Smith speaks against greed

“All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of (hu)mankind.”
                 -Adam Smith, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations

Adam Smith assumed a foundation of humanist values missing in unregulated capitalism. Corporate capitalism, as it now exists, can be called the work of Adam Smith only in the same sense that a mummy can be labeled “King Tut.” All that is missing is the heart, mind and character. All that remains is gristle and sinew.

Socialism

We Americans have been conditioned from the cradle to recoil in unthinking horror at the word “socialism.” Like Pavlov’s dogs, the mere presence of that stimulus elicits an instantaneous  and involuntary response.

 

Furthermore, when the word “socialism” is uttered, it conjures images, not of consensual worker solidarity, but only of violent statist Stalinism. When that word is spoken, we never picture worker cooperatives where labor jointly owns and manages its own businesses. Instead, our minds erupt with pre-manufactured images of mindless drones marching lock step in a frozen gulag with the music of Wagner playing in the background.

 

So now most Americans work like oxen with blinders preventing them from ever looking up to see they are pulling someone else’s weight in what will be for them an endless and futile circle.

 

We would rather endure a lifetime of indignity and wage slavery rather than consider any alternative to our bondage. Even those most injured by the economic arrangements howl involuntarily like dogs at the moon at any suggestion of worker solidarity over and against management.

 

It has been so very clever of our masters to render the obvious solution to our misery unthinkable.

The Judgement

I dreamt I had died and stood before the judgement throne. God said, “I will ask you five questions. Your answers will reveal everything that needs to be known about the rest of your life.”

 

And these were the five questions God asked of me:

1. “Were you obedient to religious customs, or did you take responsibility for your life?”

2 “Did you serve holy reason, or some human creed?”

3 “Did you purchase or create your most valued art?”

4 “Were your daydreams about dominating or serving humankind?”

5 “Did you most struggle to preserve the past or to build the future?”

 

Before I could respond, God placed a finger upon my lips and said, “Do not answer here. Answer with your life when you wake from this vision. For I do not judge to condemn the dead. What would be the point in that? I judge only to awaken the living.”

Adam Smith on Civil Government

“Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.”

― Adam Smith

 

Real Socialists on “Obamacare”

“Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy.” 

                                                                                          -Wikipedia

“You know who should be angry about Obamacare? Real socialists.” -Michael Smerconish

“‘Obamacare’ cannot be considered socialist in any way… The ACA program relies on private health insurance companies to manage health services, a socialized system would not include ‘health insurance,’ but would be an actual national health care system which would be publicly funded through progressive taxation and controlled by democratically elected assemblies of health-care workers and patients.” -Greg Pason, the national secretary for Socialist Party USA.

 

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-smerconish/what-do-socialists-think_b_4054666.htmlh-

Is Miley Cyrus a Genius? (Proof)

einstein's tongue

The 10 Worst Things to Say at a Funeral

There’s something about funerals that brings out human frailties. People mean well, but we can say the dumbest things at a funeral. After thirty years in ministry, I have a list of my top ten dumb things people say at a funeral, not in any particular order.

 

“He/She is in a better place”

Sometimes that phrase makes people feel better, but it can also make some people feel worse. For one thing, not everyone believes in an afterlife. To ask grieving people to pretend they believe something may comfort the “comforter,” but it is better to accept the grieving person on their own terms. The phrase is unhelpful for another reason. The survivor is already feeling abandoned, to hear that their spouse has already moved on and is partying in the afterlife may not be what she or he needs to hear.

 

“God never gives us more than we can handle.”

Actually bone cancer is more than most people can handle, as is torture and murder, as is the loss of a child. This is another case of the “comforters” comforting themselves.

 

“God must have needed a ____ in heaven.”

This one isn’t always hurtful, but it can give a strange view of the afterlife. If the deceased is a plumber it can sound like heaven has crummy toilets. If the deceased was a proctologist, it can raise even more serious theological issues. If the deceased was a child and one says something like “God needed a little angel,” it can leave lasting shrapnel in an already devestating wound.

 

“Everything has a purpose.”

When people say this cliche, it is usually to make themselves feel better, not the grieving person. To rationalize why an brutal accident happened leaves one with a pathological God, which can be much harder to cope with than just saying “stuff happens.” Life is sometimes unfair, to make excuses for a tragedy can make the grieving person feel very alone.

 

“I know how you feel.”

If you hear someone saying this at a funeral, take them to the side and politely say, “no you don’t.” This is usually the opening for the “comforter” to talk about a loss they have suffered in their own past. It is painful to watch a grieving person have to listen to someone else’s past problems at such a painful time. Remind the comforter “this isn’t about you.”

 

“He looks so natural.”

He may look peaceful after a long time of suffering, but he probably doesn’t look natural with a wax coating. This is the kind of phrase we wouldn’t possibly think to say if it were true, like “Joe, your hair piece looks completely natural.”

 

“Did he/she know Jesus?”

Yes, people actually ask this question at funerals. As strange as it is for some fundamentalists to grasp, bringing up the possibility that a griever’s beloved may be in eternal torment is not helpful. And if the deceased was Jewish or atheist, it is perfectly appropriate to pepper spray the comforter. As they cry out in pain, you can say, “God never gives us more than we can carry,” or “everything happens for a purpose.” That will make them feel much better.

 

“You should be happy she’s in heaven”

Again some people don’t believe in heaven, but this response can also be heard to mean, “stop grieving you make me uncomfortable.”

 

“Life goes on”

Sometimes this responsee can be helpful- if it’s heard as saying “you’re going to get through this.” It is true that time heals most wounds, but life doesn’t have a fast foward button. We get to our future healing by grieving now. Letting a person go fully into their current grief is usually much more helpful than distracting them with tales of future happiness.

 

“How are you?”

After thirty years I still slip up on this one. What I mean to say is, “are you getting through this? Do you need anything from me?” Asking this question to a devastated person can sound like we are clueless about their pain. Of course the answer is, “I am miserable.”

 

Reminder:
All communication in times of grief is trial and error. What helps on one day hurts on another. The point is to let the grieving person know we care. We do that, by letting them set the tempo and the agenda of our conversation. And, in all my years of doing this work, I’ve never found words that are as helpful as loving and attentive silence.

 

Shutdown is a revelation about what matters

It is interesting to consider what parts of government are shut down, and what are not. There is money for domestic spying, but not for regulating banks and Wall Street robbers. There is still money for drones, but not for food inspectors. There is money for congressional salaries, but not for food programs for the poorest of poor. As David Sirota notes in Salon, that’s because some people hate government (safety net, inspectors, regulators, etc.) but love the State (police state programs and the military industrial complex.)

http://www.salon.com/2013/10/06/gops_massive_fraud_the_shutdown_isnt_really_a_shutdown/